Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping cassava with maize had no significant effect on the associated phytoseiid predator populations during the intercropping, dry and postdry seasons.

A claim from Response ofMononychellus tanajoa(Acari: Tetranychidae) to Cropping Systems, Cultivars, and Pest Interventions · 1996

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping cassava with maize had no significant effect on the associated phytoseiid predator populations during the intercropping, dry and postdry seasons.

Treatment
Intercropping cassava with maizee1
Interactor
phytoseiid predatore1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
associated phytoseiid predator populationse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
cassava monocroppede0
Setting
during the intercropping, dry, and postdry seasonse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Intercropping cassava with maize had no significant effect on M. tanajoa and associated phytoseiid predator populations during the intercropping, dry, and postdry seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–978
e0

“cassava monocropped and intercropped with maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–80

Title

Response ofMononychellus tanajoa(Acari: Tetranychidae) to Cropping Systems, Cultivars, and Pest Interventions

Muaka Toko; John S. Yaninek; Robert J. O'Neil Environmental Entomology 1996. doi:10.1093/ee/25.2.237

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-07643eb61e45bb4a1d7a7dea5a77b452ebdd86c106c4520fb18aa65c063772d4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Zea mays · pest · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · pest · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.