Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Atrazine and isoproturon produced no yield difference, alone or combined.

A claim from Weed management in rainfed sorghum · 1976

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine and isoproturon produced no yield difference, alone or combined.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
atrazinee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no yield differencee0
Comparator
isoproturone0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–34
e0

“There was no yield difference between atrazine and isoproturon applied either alone or in combi-nation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–443

Title

Weed management in rainfed sorghum

G. Subba Reddy; J. Venkateswarlu; R. D. Dryden Indian Journal of Weed Science 1976

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-07b89bde681b59cda09fdcc3b5e67135fec8f4f2dff103b9d078ffb1618956a3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

atrazine · yield · SorghumResults differ

43 papers: 32 positive, 11 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Pre-emergence atrazine produced sorghum grain yield equal to hand weeding.

    In‐the‐row weed management in sorghum · 1985 · compared with hand weeding

    No difference from an alternativeCites this paper

  2. positive
    Post-emergence atrazine was selective to sorghum and did not affect productivity except with 0.5% mineral oil.

    Selectivity and Effectiveness of Herbicides in the Grain Sorghum Crop · 2019

    No difference from an alternative

  3. positive
    Atrazine antitranspirant increased sorghum grain yield with solid planting and adequate nitrogen.

    Yield of Dryland Grain Sorghum as Affected by Antitranspirant, Nitrogen, and Contributing Micro‐watershed1 · 1975

    No difference from an alternative

  4. positive
    Adding atrazine to fluthiacet-methyl considerably increased sorghum yields.

    Grain sorghum response and Palmer amaranth control with postemergence application of fluthiacet-methyl · 2014

    No difference from an alternative

  5. positive
    Atrazine increased grain yield.

    Effect of mulches and transpiration suppressants on yield, water use efficiency and uptake of nitrogen and phosphorus by sorghum under dryland conditions of north-western India · 1982 · compared with no suppressant

    No difference from an alternative

  6. positive
    Atrazine at 1 kg/ha pre-emergence with one hand-weeding and one hoeing at 6 weeks gave a higher yield (16.07 q/ha) than the recommended practice of 2 weedings and 2 hoeings (10.56 q/ha).

    Integrated weed management in sorghum · 1981 · compared with recommended practice of 2 weedings + 2 hoeings at 3 and 6 weeks

    No difference from an alternative

  7. positive
    Atrazine spraying raised sorghum yield over the unsprayed control.

    Studies on Transpiration Suppressants on Spring Sorghum in North-Western India in Relation to Soil Moisture Regimes. I. Effect on Yield and Water Use Efficiency · 1984 · compared with unsprayed control

    No difference from an alternative

  8. positive
    Atrazine at 0.5 kg a.i./ha plus one hoeing at 35 days significantly increased yields and N and P uptake compared with atrazine alone.

    Effect of row spacing, nitrogen and weed control on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) · 2005 · compared with atrazine alone

    No difference from an alternative

34 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.