Claim · model-written summary
Lettuce growth under blue light was not suppressed at high intensities.
- Taxon
- lettuce
Lactuca sativae0 - Treatment
- Blue lighte0
- Outcome
- lettuce plant growth was not suppressede0
- Qualifier
- high intensitiese0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Blue light was the least productive of the four treatments, yet lettuce plant growth was not suppressed at high intensities.”
Title
Amber LEDs outperform red, blue, and red-blue-amber LEDs for lettuce
Srinivasa Reddy; Lucas McCartney; Bo-Sen Wu; et al. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 2024. doi:10.1080/14620316.2024.2345894
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Amber light gave 33.3% greater fresh mass yield than red light at PPFD 500–700.
- Intervention effect Red light alone suppressed lettuce growth at PPFD above 800.
- Intervention effect Amber light alone suppressed lettuce growth at PPFD above 800.
- Intervention effect Blue light was least productive among the four light treatments.
- Observation Combined red-blue-amber light did not suppress growth at high intensities.
- Intervention effect Combined red-blue-amber light gave greater biomass yield than blue alone.
- Observation Pigmentation varied among the light treatments.
- Observation Bleaching occurred only under amber light above PPFD 1000.