Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cereal-pasture rotation soil reduced take-all disease severity by 6% relative to unamended infested sand.

A claim from Biological suppression of the saprophytic growth of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in soil · 1987

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cereal-pasture rotation soil reduced take-all disease severity by 6% relative to unamended infested sand.

Treatment
cereal–pasture rotation soilse0
Interactor
G. graminis var. triticiGaeumannomyces triticie1pathogen
Outcome
Disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
6%e0
Comparator
unamended, infested sand alonee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease severity, measured as the percentage of the seminal root axes with discoloured stele, was reduced by 42 and 6% with the addition of continuous wheat and cereal–pasture rotation soils, respectively, to infested sand, compared with disease severity in unamended, infested sand alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1295
e1

“disease of wheat caused by G. graminis var. tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–822

Title

Biological suppression of the saprophytic growth of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in soil

A. Simon; K. Sivasithamparam; G. C. MacNish Canadian Journal of Microbiology 1987. doi:10.1139/m87-086

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-090e239aba47653f8c38ae1fbb90a856e2dde64abab801542c14fe0f9e5cedbe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

rotation · Gaeumannomyces tritici · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.