Claim · model-written summary
Stump and root harvest could be sustainable in the study context, unlike foliage harvest.
- Taxon
- Pinus pinaster
.jpg?width=60)
Pinus pinastert0 - Outcome
- stump and root harvest could be sustainablee2
- Comparator
- foliage harveste2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e2“We concluded that stump and root harvest could be sustainable in our study context, conversely to foliage harvest”
t0“Pinus pinaster”
Title
Laurent Augusto; David L. Achat; Mark R. Bakker; et al. GCB Bioenergy 2014. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12127
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Association Root nutrient concentration decreases as root diameter increases in Pinus pinaster, independent of root function or tree age.
- Intervention effect Nutrient losses are higher under canopy harvest than under root harvest in Pinus pinaster.
- Association Thin roots have higher nutrient concentrations than coarse roots in Pinus pinaster.
- Recommendation Collecting roots only close to stumps should limit nutrient exports, particularly N, without reducing fuelwood biomass.