Claim · model-written summary
One year in a traditional silo reduced tested seed quality attributes relative to modern silo and fresh seed.
- Treatment
- traditional siloe0
- Outcome
- tested attributese0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Qualifier
- one yeare0
- Comparator
- modern silo and newly harvested seedse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Seeds stored in brick wall warehouse and traditional silo for one year showed significantly lower values of the tested attributes compared to seeds stored in the modern silo and newly harvested seeds.”
t0“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.,)”
Title
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.,) Seed Quality As Affected By Type And Duration of Storage
E. E. A. Ahmed; S. H. A. Alama Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America 2010
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect One year in brick wall warehouses reduced tested seed quality attributes relative to modern silo and fresh seed.
- Intervention effect A further year in those two stores further significantly decreased tested characters.
- Intervention effect One year in a corrugated iron warehouse gave lower test results than traditional silo and brick warehouse storage.
- Intervention effect A further year in the corrugated iron warehouse caused 60% loss of viability and germination capacity.
- Intervention effect One year in underground pits left germination ability below 0.11.
- Intervention effect One year in underground pits left viability below 0.17.
- Observation Underground pit seed contained up to 30% inert matter and other seeds.
- Intervention effect Modern silo seed protein content was similar to fresh seed and higher than other storage types.
- Intervention effect Modern silo seed oil content was similar to fresh seed and higher than other storage types.