Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The imazethapyr–imazamox then propaquizafop sequence matched the maximum weed reduction treatment.

A claim from Efficacy of sequential application of imazethapyr + imazamox and propaquizafop in cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) in two texturally different soils · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The imazethapyr–imazamox then propaquizafop sequence matched the maximum weed reduction treatment.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox (Odyssey) 70 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/hae0
Outcome
at pare0
Direction
at pare0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was at par with imazethapyr + imazamox (Odyssey) 70 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–874
t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94

Title

Efficacy of sequential application of imazethapyr + imazamox and propaquizafop in cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) in two texturally different soils

MEENAKSHI SANGWAN; SAMUNDER SINGH; SATYAVAN Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v61i4.4406

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-0ce395dbd42e1b50fb0b6c5feb256445799f743b38546a458c8df80ffa096793 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer