Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Efficacy of sequential application of imazethapyr + imazamox and propaquizafop in cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) in two texturally different soils

MEENAKSHI SANGWAN; SAMUNDER SINGH; SATYAVAN

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during winter (kharif) season of 2013 to evaluate at the farmers field in Kheri Batter, Bhiwani on loamy sand soil and at Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar on sandy loam soil efficacy of sequential application of different herbicides on cluster bean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub] Pre-emergence (PRE) application of pendimethalin @ 1.0 kg/ha provided 8590% weed dry weight re- duction up to 30 days after sowing (DAS); however at 60 DAS percent reduction of weed dry weight was lowered by 2530% under both the soil texture. At 60 DAS, maximum dry weight reduction (95% at Kheri Batter and 91% at Hisar) was recorded, under post-emergence (POE) sequential application of imazethapyr 100 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha; which was at par with imazethapyr + imazamox (Odyssey) 70 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha. The efficacy of imazethapyr + imazamox was lower in sandy loam soil than loamy sand. A sequential application of imazethapyr 100 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha and imazethapyr + imazamox 70 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha POE resulted in the highest seed yield and maximum net returns at the Kheri Batter loca- tion; but at Hisar location, highest seed yield and maximum net returns were observed under imazethapyr 100 g/ ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha. Lower yield and net returns were observed under imazethapyr + imazamox 70 g/ ha at 3 weak after sowing (WAS) fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha at 6 WAS at location Hisar, due to lower efficacy of Odyssey in sandy loam soil against Trianthema portulacastrum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin reduced weed dry weight by 8590% through 30 DAS.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
pendimethalin @ 1.0 kg/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry weighte0
Direction
re- ductione0
Value
8590%e0
Qualifier
up to 30 days after sowing (DAS)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-emergence (PRE) application of pendimethalin @ 1.0 kg/ha provided 8590% weed dry weight re- duction up to 30 days after sowing (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pendimethalin weed dry-weight reduction fell by 2530% at 60 DAS.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry weighte0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
2530%e0
Qualifier
at 60 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“however at 60 DAS percent reduction of weed dry weight was lowered by 2530% under both the soil texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential imazethapyr then propaquizafop reduced weed dry weight by 95% at Kheri Batter.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
imazethapyr 100 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/hae0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
reductione0
Value
95%e0
Qualifier
At 60 DASe0
Setting
Kheri Battere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 60 DAS, maximum dry weight reduction (95% at Kheri Batter and 91% at Hisar) was recorded, under post-emergence (POE) sequential application of imazethapyr 100 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential imazethapyr then propaquizafop reduced weed dry weight by 91% at Hisar.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
imazethapyr 100 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/hae0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
reductione0
Value
91%e0
Qualifier
At 60 DASe0
Setting
Hisare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 60 DAS, maximum dry weight reduction (95% at Kheri Batter and 91% at Hisar) was recorded, under post-emergence (POE) sequential application of imazethapyr 100 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The imazethapyr–imazamox then propaquizafop sequence matched the maximum weed reduction treatment.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox (Odyssey) 70 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/hae0
Outcome
at pare0
Direction
at pare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was at par with imazethapyr + imazamox (Odyssey) 70 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr plus imazamox had lower efficacy in sandy loam than loamy sand.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamoxe0
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
loamy sande0
Setting
sandy loam soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficacy of imazethapyr + imazamox was lower in sandy loam soil than loamy sand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The imazethapyr then propaquizafop sequence had highest seed yield at Kheri Batter.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
imazethapyr 100 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/hae0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
Kheri Battere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A sequential application of imazethapyr 100 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha and imazethapyr + imazamox 70 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha POE resulted in the highest seed yield and maximum net returns at the Kheri Batter loca- tion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The imazethapyr then propaquizafop sequence had highest net returns at Kheri Batter.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
imazethapyr 100 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/hae0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
maximume0
Setting
Kheri Battere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A sequential application of imazethapyr 100 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha and imazethapyr + imazamox 70 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha POE resulted in the highest seed yield and maximum net returns at the Kheri Batter loca- tion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The imazethapyr plus imazamox then propaquizafop sequence had highest seed yield at Kheri Batter.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox 70 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/hae0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
Kheri Battere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A sequential application of imazethapyr 100 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha and imazethapyr + imazamox 70 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha POE resulted in the highest seed yield and maximum net returns at the Kheri Batter loca- tion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The imazethapyr plus imazamox then propaquizafop sequence had highest net returns at Kheri Batter.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox 70 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/hae0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
maximume0
Setting
Kheri Battere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A sequential application of imazethapyr 100 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha and imazethapyr + imazamox 70 g/ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha POE resulted in the highest seed yield and maximum net returns at the Kheri Batter loca- tion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The imazethapyr then propaquizafop sequence had highest seed yield at Hisar.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
imazethapyr 100 g/ ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/hae0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
Hisare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Hisar location, highest seed yield and maximum net returns were observed under imazethapyr 100 g/ ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The imazethapyr then propaquizafop sequence had highest net returns at Hisar.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
imazethapyr 100 g/ ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/hae0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
maximume0
Setting
Hisare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Hisar location, highest seed yield and maximum net returns were observed under imazethapyr 100 g/ ha fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Hisar, the imazethapyr plus imazamox sequence had lower yield.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox 70 g/ ha at 3 weak after sowing (WAS) fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha at 6 WASe0
Interactor
Trianthema portulacastrumTrianthema portulacastrume0weed
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
Lowere0
Setting
Hisare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trianthema portulacastrum
Trianthema portulacastrum · InteractorGraham Racher · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower yield and net returns were observed under imazethapyr + imazamox 70 g/ ha at 3 weak after sowing (WAS) fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha at 6 WAS at location Hisar, due to lower efficacy of Odyssey in sandy loam soil against Trianthema portulacastrum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1579 · show in text ↑
t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Hisar, the imazethapyr plus imazamox sequence had lower net returns.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox 70 g/ ha at 3 weak after sowing (WAS) fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha at 6 WASe0
Interactor
Trianthema portulacastrumTrianthema portulacastrume0weed
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
Lowere0
Setting
Hisare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trianthema portulacastrum
Trianthema portulacastrum · InteractorGraham Racher · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower yield and net returns were observed under imazethapyr + imazamox 70 g/ ha at 3 weak after sowing (WAS) fb propaquizafop 62.5 g/ha at 6 WAS at location Hisar, due to lower efficacy of Odyssey in sandy loam soil against Trianthema portulacastrum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1579 · show in text ↑
t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑

propaquizafop · growth · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Imazethapyr · Trianthema portulacastrum · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Imazethapyr · growth · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

propaquizafop · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

imazamox · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.