Abstract
AbstractThe clusterbean is confined mainly as rainfed crop during kharif season in Rajasthan. Clusterbean is severely infested by many broad-leaved and grassy weeds which cause considerable loss of clusterbean productivity and economic returns. A field experiment was conducted for two consecutive years i.e. Kharif 2021 and 2022 on sandy loam soils of Western Rajasthan to assess the effect of new herbicide molecules on weed management and productivity of clusterbean (cultivar HG 2-20). A randomized block design (RBD) with four replications was used. The post-emergence application of propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75% w/w (propaquizafop + imazethapyr) 135 g/ha at 20 days after seeding recorded maximum weed control efficiency, clusterbean growth, yield attributes, seed yield, net return and B:C ratio of 2.0 and was at par with weed free.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Post-emergence propaquizafop plus imazethapyr gave maximum weed control efficiency in clusterbean, at par with weed-free plots.
- Taxon
- clusterbean
Cyamopsis tetragonolobae5 - Material
- HG 2-20e5
- Treatment
- post-emergence application of propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75% w/w (propaquizafop + imazethapyr) 135 g/hae1
- Interactor
- weedst1weed
- Outcome
- weed control efficiencye2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Comparator
- weed freee3
- Setting
- sandy loam soils of Western Rajasthane4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“post-emergence application of propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75% w/w (propaquizafop + imazethapyr) 135 g/ha”
e2“recorded maximum weed control efficiency, clusterbean growth, yield attributes, seed yield, net return and B:C ratio of 2.0”
e3“was at par with weed free”
e4“sandy loam soils of Western Rajasthan”
e5“clusterbean (cultivar HG 2-20)”
t1“herbicides on weeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Post-emergence propaquizafop plus imazethapyr gave maximum clusterbean growth, yield attributes and seed yield, at par with weed-free plots.
- Taxon
- clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobae5
- Material
- HG 2-20e5
- Treatment
- post-emergence application of propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75% w/w (propaquizafop + imazethapyr) 135 g/hae1
- Outcome
- clusterbean growth, yield attributes, seed yielde2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Comparator
- weed freee3
- Setting
- sandy loam soils of Western Rajasthane4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“post-emergence application of propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75% w/w (propaquizafop + imazethapyr) 135 g/ha”
e2“recorded maximum weed control efficiency, clusterbean growth, yield attributes, seed yield, net return and B:C ratio of 2.0”
e3“was at par with weed free”
e4“sandy loam soils of Western Rajasthan”
e5“clusterbean (cultivar HG 2-20)”
Claim · model-written summary
Post-emergence propaquizafop plus imazethapyr gave maximum net return in clusterbean, at par with weed-free plots.
- Taxon
- clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobae5
- Material
- HG 2-20e5
- Treatment
- post-emergence application of propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75% w/w (propaquizafop + imazethapyr) 135 g/hae1
- Outcome
- net returne2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Comparator
- weed freee3
- Setting
- sandy loam soils of Western Rajasthane4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“post-emergence application of propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75% w/w (propaquizafop + imazethapyr) 135 g/ha”
e2“recorded maximum weed control efficiency, clusterbean growth, yield attributes, seed yield, net return and B:C ratio of 2.0”
e3“was at par with weed free”
e4“sandy loam soils of Western Rajasthan”
e5“clusterbean (cultivar HG 2-20)”
Claim · model-written summary
Post-emergence propaquizafop plus imazethapyr gave a B:C ratio of 2.0 in clusterbean, at par with weed-free plots.
- Taxon
- clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobae5
- Material
- HG 2-20e5
- Treatment
- post-emergence application of propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75% w/w (propaquizafop + imazethapyr) 135 g/hae1
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 2.0e2
- Comparator
- weed freee3
- Setting
- sandy loam soils of Western Rajasthane4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“post-emergence application of propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75% w/w (propaquizafop + imazethapyr) 135 g/ha”
e2“recorded maximum weed control efficiency, clusterbean growth, yield attributes, seed yield, net return and B:C ratio of 2.0”
e3“was at par with weed free”
e4“sandy loam soils of Western Rajasthan”
e5“clusterbean (cultivar HG 2-20)”
The same questions in other papers
Imazethapyr · weed · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →propaquizafop · weed · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
propaquizafop · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Imazethapyr · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree
22 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →herbicide · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →herbicide · weed · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree
20 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.