Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of weed management practices on weed dynamics in clusterbean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub]

Hitesh Borana; I Singh; JR Verma; et al.

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to find out the effect of weed management practices on weed dynamics in clusterbean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub]. The experiment was carried out during kharif season of 2018 and ten treatment combination of different herbicides were replicated thrice in RBD. Results revealed that the early post-emergence application of imazethapyr + imazamox 50 g/ha + HW at 35 DAS was found the most effective treatment which recorded lowest density of narrow and broad leaved weeds and minimum weed dry matter at all growth stages. This treatment also recorded significantly higher seed yield (1180 kg/ha) with higher weed control efficiency (92.8%) and lowest weed competition index (4.6%). This practice of weed management was statistically at par with weed free season long plots and another treatment of application of imazethapyr 40 g/ha at 20 DAS + HW at 35 DAS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr plus imazamox and hand weeding gave the lowest narrow and broad leaved weed density.

Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox 50 g/ha + HW at 35 DASe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
density of narrow and broad leaved weedse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early post-emergence application of imazethapyr + imazamox 50 g/ha + HW at 35 DAS was found the most effective treatment which recorded lowest density of narrow and broad leaved weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–508 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment gave minimum weed dry matter at all growth stages.

Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox 50 g/ha + HW at 35 DASe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry mattere0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early post-emergence application of imazethapyr + imazamox 50 g/ha + HW at 35 DAS was found the most effective treatment which recorded lowest density of narrow and broad leaved weeds and minimum weed dry matter at all growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–557 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment produced seed yield of 1180 kg/ha.

Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox 50 g/ha + HW at 35 DASe1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1180 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also recorded significantly higher seed yield (1180 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–632 · show in text ↑
e1

“imazethapyr + imazamox 50 g/ha + HW at 35 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment achieved weed control efficiency of 92.8%.

Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox 50 g/ha + HW at 35 DASe1
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
92.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher weed control efficiency (92.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–676 · show in text ↑
e1

“imazethapyr + imazamox 50 g/ha + HW at 35 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment gave a weed competition index of 4.6%.

Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox 50 g/ha + HW at 35 DASe1
Outcome
weed competition indexe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
4.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest weed competition index (4.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–717 · show in text ↑
e1

“imazethapyr + imazamox 50 g/ha + HW at 35 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

This treatment was statistically at par with season long weed free plots.

Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox 50 g/ha + HW at 35 DASe1
Outcome
statistically at pare0
Direction
statistically at pare0
Comparator
weed free season long plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This practice of weed management was statistically at par with weed free season long plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–809 · show in text ↑
e1

“imazethapyr + imazamox 50 g/ha + HW at 35 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

This treatment was statistically at par with imazethapyr 40 g/ha plus hand weeding.

Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox 50 g/ha + HW at 35 DASe1
Outcome
statistically at pare0
Direction
statistically at pare0
Comparator
imazethapyr 40 g/ha at 20 DAS + HW at 35 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This practice of weed management was statistically at par with weed free season long plots and another treatment of application of imazethapyr 40 g/ha at 20 DAS + HW at 35 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–894 · show in text ↑
e1

“imazethapyr + imazamox 50 g/ha + HW at 35 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–103 · show in text ↑

imazamox · weed · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Imazethapyr · weed · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

imazamox · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.