Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The treatment gave a weed competition index of 4.6%.

A claim from Effect of weed management practices on weed dynamics in clusterbean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub] · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment gave a weed competition index of 4.6%.

Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox 50 g/ha + HW at 35 DASe1
Outcome
weed competition indexe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
4.6%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest weed competition index (4.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–717
e1

“imazethapyr + imazamox 50 g/ha + HW at 35 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–406
t0

“clusterbean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–103

Title

Effect of weed management practices on weed dynamics in clusterbean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub]

Hitesh Borana; I Singh; JR Verma; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2021. doi:10.22271/chemi.2021.v9.i1e.11250

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-a04536d69d3aa8bf4cd480e544a7a23723c6d7828be333077e4edf81df07f04b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

imazamox · weed · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Imazethapyr · weed · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.