Paper · 2021 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Response of weeds to different herbicides and their time of application in clusterbean

A.L. Yadav; R.S. Yadav; Amit Kumawat

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted under loamy sand soil during Kharif (rainy season), 2018 at Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner to evaluate the bio-efficacy of herbicides in clusterbean as affected by time of application. Results revealed that imazethapyr + imazamox at 50 g/ha as PoE (20 DAS) and pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.80 kg/ha as PE resulted in the lowest weed density and dry weight of both monocot and dicot weeds. Higher weed control efficiencies were also noted under these treatments. Plant height, pods per plant, seeds per pod and seed and straw yields, net returns and benefit: cost ratio were also superior with imazethapyr + imazamox at 50 g/ha as PoE (20 DAS) and pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.80 kg/ha as PE compared to the other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence imazethapyr plus imazamox yielded the lowest monocot and dicot weed density and dry weight.

Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox at 50 g/ha as PoE (20 DAS)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weed density and dry weight of both monocot and dicot weedse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imazethapyr + imazamox at 50 g/ha as PoE (20 DAS) and pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.80 kg/ha as PE resulted in the lowest weed density and dry weight of both monocot and dicot weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–453 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence pendimethalin plus imazethapyr yielded the lowest monocot and dicot weed density and dry weight.

Treatment
pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.80 kg/ha as PEe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weed density and dry weight of both monocot and dicot weedse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imazethapyr + imazamox at 50 g/ha as PoE (20 DAS) and pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.80 kg/ha as PE resulted in the lowest weed density and dry weight of both monocot and dicot weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–453 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence imazethapyr plus imazamox had higher weed control efficiency.

Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox at 50 g/ha as PoE (20 DAS)e1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed control efficienciese0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher weed control efficiencies were also noted under these treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–526 · show in text ↑
e1

“imazethapyr + imazamox at 50 g/ha as PoE (20 DAS) and pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.80 kg/ha as PE resulted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–379 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence pendimethalin plus imazethapyr had higher weed control efficiency.

Treatment
pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.80 kg/ha as PEe1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed control efficienciese0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher weed control efficiencies were also noted under these treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–526 · show in text ↑
e1

“imazethapyr + imazamox at 50 g/ha as PoE (20 DAS) and pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.80 kg/ha as PE resulted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–379 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence imazethapyr plus imazamox was superior for height, pod and seed counts, yields, and economic returns.

Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox at 50 g/ha as PoE (20 DAS)e0
Outcome
Plant height, pods per plant, seeds per pod and seed and straw yields, net returns and benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height, pods per plant, seeds per pod and seed and straw yields, net returns and benefit: cost ratio were also superior with imazethapyr + imazamox at 50 g/ha as PoE (20 DAS) and pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.80 kg/ha as PE compared to the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence pendimethalin plus imazethapyr was superior for height, pod and seed counts, yields, and economic returns.

Treatment
pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.80 kg/ha as PEe0
Outcome
Plant height, pods per plant, seeds per pod and seed and straw yields, net returns and benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height, pods per plant, seeds per pod and seed and straw yields, net returns and benefit: cost ratio were also superior with imazethapyr + imazamox at 50 g/ha as PoE (20 DAS) and pendimethalin + imazethapyr at 0.80 kg/ha as PE compared to the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑

imazamox · weed · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Imazethapyr · weed · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

imazamox · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.