Claim · model-written summary
Quality characteristics varied significantly across years.
- Taxon
- APPLESt0
- Outcome
- Temporal variability was significant for quality characteristicse0
- Qualifier
- probably due to differences in weather conditions from year to yeare0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Verbatim
t0“APPLES”
e0“Temporal variability was significant for quality characteristics, probably due to differences in weather conditions from year to year”
Title
SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIABILITY OF YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY IN APPLES
K.D. Aggelopoulou; G.D. Nanos; T.A. Gemtos Acta Horticulturae 2010. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2010.877.96
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Yield and quality had significant spatial variability.
- Observation Quality varied less spatially than yield.
- Observation Soluble solids content and flesh firmness had low spatial variability.
- Observation Fruit mass, acidity and skin colour had high spatial variability.
- Observation Year-to-year yield variability was low in Red Chief.
- Observation Year-to-year yield variability was high in Fuji due to alternate bearing.
- Intervention effect Cold storage reduced flesh firmness and acidity.
- Intervention effect Cold storage raised soluble solids content in Red Chief.
- Intervention effect Cold storage did not change soluble solids content in Fuji.