Claim · model-written summary
Yield in traffic lanes was on average around 17% lower than in non-trafficked beds.
- Taxon
- Cerealt0
- Treatment
- traffic lanese0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- losse0
- Value
- 17%e0
- Qualifier
- on averagee0
- Comparator
- non-trafficked bedse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Verbatim
t0“Cereal”
e0“Lower ear numbers observed in the traffic lanes led to heavier grains, but increased grain weight was insufficient to avoid a yield loss, which on average was around 17% compared with the non-trafficked beds”
Title
W. C. Tim Chamen; Diogenes L. Antille 2022 Houston, Texas July 17-20, 2022 2022. doi:10.13031/aim.202200055
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Remedial work on traffic lanes (loosening in the center or on the shoulders) gave little advantage in yields and ear numbers.
- Intervention effect Ear numbers were lower in traffic lanes than in non-trafficked beds.
- Intervention effect Grains from traffic lanes were heavier than those from non-trafficked beds, but the increased grain weight did not avoid a yield loss.
- Intervention effect At one site where the combine harvester effect could be isolated, the combine harvester more than doubled yield losses.
- Intervention effect Length of time as a traffic lane had no measurable impact on the extent of yield reduction.