Claim · model-written summary
Together with UV-B, the Ni0.01 effect on soybean growth was inhibitory.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- together with UV-Be2
- Outcome
- growthe2
- Direction
- inhibitorye2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on growth, photosynthetic electron transport activity, the contents of reactive oxygen species (ROS), antioxidants, lipid peroxidation, and membrane leakage in soybean seedlings were evaluated”
e2“Contrary to this, Ni0.01 stimulated growth, however, the effect together with UV-B was inhibitory”
Title
S. M. Prasad; R. Dwivedi; M. Zeeshan Photosynthetica 2005. doi:10.1007/s11099-005-0031-0
Other claims from this paper (16)
- Intervention effect Ni0.10 and Ni1.00 declined soybean growth and chlorophyll content.
- Intervention effect UV-B declined soybean growth and chlorophyll content.
- Intervention effect Ni0.01 stimulated soybean growth.
- Observation Carotenoids in soybean seedlings showed a varied response to both stresses.
- Intervention effect UV-B alone significantly reduced the activities of photosystems 1 and 2 and whole chain activity in soybean.
- Intervention effect Simultaneous UV-B and Ni exposure significantly reduced the activities of photosystems 1 and 2 and whole chain activity in soybean.
- Intervention effect Ni alone strongly inhibited PS2 and whole chain activity in soybean.
- Intervention effect Ni alone stimulated PS1 activity in soybean.
- Intervention effect Both stresses, alone and together, enhanced superoxide radical, hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde contents in soybean compared with control.
- Intervention effect Both stresses, alone and together, enhanced electrolyte leakage and proline content in soybean compared with control.
- Intervention effect Both stresses, alone and together, declined ascorbate content in soybean compared with control.
- Intervention effect Individual stress treatments increased catalase, peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities in soybean.
- Intervention effect Ni1.00 significantly declined SOD activity in soybean.
- Intervention effect Combined exposure declined CAT activity in soybean even more than control.
- Intervention effect Simultaneous exposure strongly inhibited photosynthetic electron transport in soybean compared with individual UV-B and Ni effects.
- Intervention effect Simultaneous exposure caused excessive accumulation of ROS in soybean compared with individual UV-B and Ni effects.