Claim · model-written summary
Selection in the dual-purpose system may offer equal or slightly less fall forage biomass without greatly changing forage total N and nitrate concentrations.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- Selection in the DP systeme6
- Outcome
- fall forage biomasse6
- Direction
- equal or slightly lesse6
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is the foundation of many agricultural enterprises in the southern Great Plains”
e6“Selection in the DP system appears to offer equal or slightly less fall forage biomass without greatly changing forage total N and nitrate concentrations”
Title
Charles T. MacKown; Brett F. Carver Crop Science 2005. doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.0322
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Selection environment had a significant effect on fall forage biomass of winter wheat nurseries at P = 0.09 and P = 0.07.
- Intervention effect The selection environment effect on fall forage biomass of winter wheat was not significant in the second year.
- Intervention effect Selection environment had a significant effect on forage total N of winter wheat.
- Intervention effect Total N in dual-purpose selections was slightly greater (2.5%) than in base and grain-only selections.
- Intervention effect Selection environment did not change forage nitrate levels of winter wheat.
- Association Forage nitrate of winter wheat was affected by genetic background.