Claim · model-written summary
Total N in dual-purpose selections was slightly greater (2.5%) than in base and grain-only selections.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- DP selectionse4
- Outcome
- Total Ne4
- Direction
- slightly greatere4
- Value
- 2.5%e4
- Qualifier
- P < 0.05e4
- Comparator
- B and GO selectionse4
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is the foundation of many agricultural enterprises in the southern Great Plains”
e4“Total N in DP selections was slightly greater (2.5%, P < 0.05) than those from B and GO selections”
Title
Charles T. MacKown; Brett F. Carver Crop Science 2005. doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.0322
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Selection environment had a significant effect on fall forage biomass of winter wheat nurseries at P = 0.09 and P = 0.07.
- Intervention effect The selection environment effect on fall forage biomass of winter wheat was not significant in the second year.
- Intervention effect Selection environment had a significant effect on forage total N of winter wheat.
- Intervention effect Selection environment did not change forage nitrate levels of winter wheat.
- Association Forage nitrate of winter wheat was affected by genetic background.
- Intervention effect Selection in the dual-purpose system may offer equal or slightly less fall forage biomass without greatly changing forage total N and nitrate concentrations.