Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Etiolated cuttings rooted at 71.7% compared with 41.7% for non-etiolated controls.

A claim from Rejuvenation and Adventitious Rooting in Coppice-Shoot Cuttings of Tectona grandis as Affected by Stock-Plant Etiolation · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Etiolated cuttings rooted at 71.7% compared with 41.7% for non-etiolated controls.

Taxon
teakt0
Treatment
Etiolated SNCse0
Outcome
rootinge0
Value
71.7%e0
Qualifier
41.7%e0
Comparator
controls (non-etiolated)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Etiolated SNCs have shown 71.7% rooting, whereas for controls (non-etiolated), the response was 41.7%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–781
t0

“teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–218

Title

Rejuvenation and Adventitious Rooting in Coppice-Shoot Cuttings of Tectona grandis as Affected by Stock-Plant Etiolation

Azamal Husen American Journal of Plant Sciences 2011. doi:10.4236/ajps.2011.23042

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-101c2cd13754ffab83bc43b33a8e13e73b2ba037dd663d888cf06fb77a6b2e78 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer