Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Needle nitrogen concentrations increased to 1.84 per cent in 1985 following refertilization with NPK.

A claim from Effects of Refertilization on Growth and Nutrition of Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.) Planted on a Minerotrophic Peatland in Central Newfoundland, Canada · 1994

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Needle nitrogen concentrations increased to 1.84 per cent in 1985 following refertilization with NPK.

Taxon
Lodgepole PinePinus contortat0
Treatment
refertilization with NPKe6
Outcome
needle nitrogen concentrationse6
Direction
increasede6
Value
1.84 per cente6
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–92
e0

“was refertilized in 1985 with control, P, PK and NPK treatments consisting of 60 kg ha −1 phosphorus, 100 kg ha −1 potassium and 200 kg ha −1 nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–317
e6

“Similarly, needle nitrogen concentrations increased to 1.84 per cent in 1985 following refertilization with NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1510

Title

Effects of Refertilization on Growth and Nutrition of Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.) Planted on a Minerotrophic Peatland in Central Newfoundland, Canada

E. D. WELLS; H. G. MILLER Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research 1994. doi:10.1093/forestry/67.2.149

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-113063bdf4a4dd5f849ea10071000f31ee72912a3282f65443d2826c30c50575 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.