Claim · model-written summary
Growers using intracanopy LED supplemental lighting need not expect negative effects on tomato fruit quality from narrow-band supplemental radiation.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume4 - Treatment
- narrow-band supplemental radiatione4
- Outcome
- quality of their tomato fruitse4
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e4“Growers interested in reducing supplemental lighting energy consumption by using intracanopy LED (IC-LED) supplemental lighting need not be concerned that the quality of their tomato fruits will be negatively affected by narrow-band supplemental radiation at the intensities and wavelengths used in this study”
Title
Michael P. Dzakovich; Celina Gómez; Cary A. Mitchell HortScience 2015. doi:10.21273/hortsci.50.10.1498
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Observation Chromacity, Brix and titratable acidity of tomato fruit extracts indicated plant response differences between lighting treatments.
- Observation Electrical conductivity and pH of tomato fruit extracts indicated plant response differences between lighting treatments.
- Observation Statistically significant physicochemical differences between tomatoes under supplemental lighting were not noticeable to tasters.
- Intervention effect Tasters could not discern between tomatoes from supplemental lighting treatments and unsupplemented controls in blind testing.