Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Long-term continuous cropping significantly lowered the Fusarium population density and the dominance index of dominant species compared with short-term continuous cropping.

A claim from Impact of long-term continuous cropping on the Fusarium population in soybean rhizosphere · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term continuous cropping significantly lowered the Fusarium population density and the dominance index of dominant species compared with short-term continuous cropping.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
LCCe2
Interactor
FusariumFusariume2pathogen
Outcome
population density of Fusarium population and the dominance index of dominant speciese2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
SCCe2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–77
e2

“In LCC field,the population density of Fusarium population and the dominance index of dominant species were significantly lower than that in SCC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1037

Title

Impact of long-term continuous cropping on the Fusarium population in soybean rhizosphere

Wei We Yingyong shengtai xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-11db0bfe0b7ae1dbc2bf4c8de9b206db86c3509cf606e30706b5045baaccba86 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

rotation · Fusarium · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.