Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In 1989, disulfoton-treated cotton plots had 53% less stand reduction than controls when thrips were present.

A claim from Effect of Thrips Infestation on the Development of Cotton Seedling Diseases · 1991

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1989, disulfoton-treated cotton plots had 53% less stand reduction than controls when thrips were present.

Treatment
insecticide-treated plotse0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
standse0
Direction
lesse0
Value
53%e0
Qualifier
1989e0
Comparator
control plotse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When thrips were present, stands were reduced 47 and 53% less in insecticide-treated plots than in control plots in 1986 and 1989, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–367
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57

Title

Effect of Thrips Infestation on the Development of Cotton Seedling Diseases

P. D. Colyer Plant Disease 1991. doi:10.1094/pd-75-0380

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-12dfeabc94f323e85f34a59763f7890968cf80acfe6371ed60bf95bcc16e70eb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

insecticide · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.