Claim · model-written summary
Resistant H69-8235 had higher A, g and SGR than H65-7052.
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“A, g, and SGR of a salinity-resistant cultivar (H69-8235) were consistently higher than those of a salinity-susceptible cultivar (H65-7052) at all levels of salinity”
t0“Sugarcane”
Title
Carbon Isotope Discrimination, Gas Exchange, and Growth of Sugarcane Cultivars under Salinity
F. C. Meinzer; Z. Plaut; N. Z. Saliendra PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 1994. doi:10.1104/pp.104.2.521
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect CO2 assimilation, stomatal conductance and shoot growth declined above 2 dS m-1.
- Observation These measures declined less sharply in the resistant cultivar.
- Observation Carbon isotope discrimination increased with salinity.
- Observation Carbon isotope discrimination increased with elapsed time.
- Mechanism Variation in discrimination was largely attributable to bundle sheath CO2 leakiness.
- Mechanism Increased leakiness appeared caused by lower C3 pathway activity relative to C4.
- Association Discrimination correlated strongly with A, g and SGR.
- Method / resource Discrimination permitted prediction of A, g and SGR.