Claim · model-written summary
Tillage did not affect cumulative water loss.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- tillage systemse0
- Outcome
- Cumulative water losse0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cumulative water loss and norflurazon and fluometuron concentrations in runoff were not affected by tillage systems.”
t0“Cotton”
Title
TODD A. BAUGHMAN; DAVID R. SHAW; ERIC P. WEBSTER; et al. Weed Technology 2001. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2001)015[0184:eocght]2.0.co;2
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Tillage did not affect norflurazon concentration in runoff.
- Intervention effect Tillage did not affect fluometuron concentration in runoff.
- Intervention effect No-till had less sediment runoff than conventional tillage in 1992.
- Intervention effect Tillage did not affect sediment loss in 1993.
- Observation Conventional tillage had the highest total fluometuron loss in 1992.
- Observation Reduced tillage had the lowest total fluometuron loss in 1993.
- Intervention effect Cumulative norflurazon loss did not differ across tillage systems in 1992.
- Intervention effect Reduced tillage lowered norflurazon runoff loss in 1993.
- Recommendation The authors caution that conservation tillage may reduce sediment loss without necessarily minimizing herbicide runoff loss.