Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during kharif season of 2011-12 to 2016-17 at Main Dry Farming Research Station, JAU, Targhadia to study the rainwater management for sustaining cotton productivity in medium black soil under dry farming condition. Main plot comprised of two tillage practices viz., ploughing every year up to 30 cm in set row(T1) and ploughing alternate year up to 30 cm in set row (T2) and sub plot of five management practices viz., FYM @ 10 t/ha + kaolin @ 4% spray (M1), FYM @ 10 t/ha + guar gum @ 0.3% spray (M2), gypsum@ 1 t/ha + kaolin @ 4% spray (M3), gypsum@1t/ha + guar gum @ 0.3% spray (M4) and control(M5) was evaluated in split plot design with four replications. On the basis of six year pooled results, significantly higher seed cotton and stalk yield was obtained under application of FYM @ 10 t/ha + kaolin @ 4% spray (M1) and it was remained at par with the application of FYM @ 10 t/ha + guar gum @ 0.3% spray (M2) in management practices. Whereas individual effect of tillage practices and interaction effect of tillage and management practices on seed cotton yield and stalk yield were found non-significant. Maximum rain water and crop water use efficiency as well as net returns with B:C ratio were recorded in ploughing every year up to 30 cm in set row (T1) and application of FYM @ 10 t/ha + kaolin 4 % spray(M1) under tillage and management practices, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus kaolin produced significantly higher seed cotton and stalk yield.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- FYM @ 10 t/ha + kaolin @ 4% spraye0
- Outcome
- seed cotton and stalk yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher seed cotton and stalk yield was obtained under application of FYM @ 10 t/ha + kaolin @ 4% spray (M1)”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus kaolin yield was at par with FYM plus guar gum.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- FYM @ 10 t/ha + guar gum @ 0.3% spraye0
- Outcome
- at pare0
- Direction
- at pare0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it was remained at par with the application of FYM @ 10 t/ha + guar gum @ 0.3% spray (M2) in management practices”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage practices had no significant individual effect on seed cotton and stalk yield.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- tillage practicese0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yield and stalk yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“individual effect of tillage practices and interaction effect of tillage and management practices on seed cotton yield and stalk yield were found non-significant”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage and management interaction did not significantly affect seed cotton and stalk yield.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- tillage and management practicese0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yield and stalk yielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“interaction effect of tillage and management practices on seed cotton yield and stalk yield were found non-significant”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Annual ploughing produced maximum rain water and crop water use efficiency.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- ploughing every year up to 30 cm in set row (T1)e0
- Outcome
- rain water and crop water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- Maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum rain water and crop water use efficiency as well as net returns with B:C ratio were recorded in ploughing every year up to 30 cm in set row (T1)”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Annual ploughing produced maximum net returns and benefit-cost ratio.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- ploughing every year up to 30 cm in set row (T1)e0
- Outcome
- net returns with B:C ratioe0
- Direction
- Maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum rain water and crop water use efficiency as well as net returns with B:C ratio were recorded in ploughing every year up to 30 cm in set row (T1)”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus kaolin produced maximum rain water and crop water use efficiency.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- application of FYM @ 10 t/ha + kaolin 4 % spray(M1)e0
- Outcome
- rain water and crop water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- Maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum rain water and crop water use efficiency as well as net returns with B:C ratio were recorded in ploughing every year up to 30 cm in set row (T1) and application of FYM @ 10 t/ha + kaolin 4 % spray(M1) under tillage and management practices, respectively”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus kaolin produced maximum net returns and benefit-cost ratio.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- application of FYM @ 10 t/ha + kaolin 4 % spray(M1)e0
- Outcome
- net returns with B:C ratioe0
- Direction
- Maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum rain water and crop water use efficiency as well as net returns with B:C ratio were recorded in ploughing every year up to 30 cm in set row (T1) and application of FYM @ 10 t/ha + kaolin 4 % spray(M1) under tillage and management practices, respectively”
t0“Cotton”
The same questions in other papers
kaolin · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
kaolin · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →tillage · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →application · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →fertilization · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →tillage · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
155 papers more in this group
See all 159 papers →application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
279 papers more in this group
See all 283 papers →fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
546 papers more in this group
See all 550 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.