Paper · 2004 · Annals of Applied Biology

Aerated subsurface irrigation water gives growth and yield benefits to zucchini, vegetable soybean and cotton in heavy clay soils

S P BHATTARAI; S HUBER; DAVID J MIDMORE

16
claims
36
verbatim quotes
144
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Summary Inadequate oxygen concentration in the root zone is a constraint to plant performance particularly in heavy, compacted and/or saline soils. Sub‐surface drip irrigation (SDI) offers a means of increasing oxygen to plant roots in such soils, provided irrigation water can be hyper‐aerated or oxygenated. Hydrogen peroxide (HP) at the rate of 5 litre ha −1 at the end of each irrigation cycle was injected through SDI tape to a field‐grown zucchini (courgette) crop ( Cucurbita pepo ) on a saturated heavy clay soil in Queensland, Australia. Fruit yield, number and shoot weight increased by 25%, 29% and 24% respectively due to HP treatment compared to the control. Two pot experiments with vegetable soybean ( Glycine max ) and cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum ) compared the effectiveness of HP and air injection using a Mazzei air injector (a venturi), throughout the irrigation cycle in raising crop yield in a heavy clay soil kept at saturation or just under field capacity. Fresh pod yield of vegetable soybean increased by 82–96% in aeration treatments compared with the control. The yield increase was associated with more pods per plant and greater mean pod weight. Significantly higher above ground biomass and light interception were evident with aeration, irrespective of soil water treatment. Similarly cotton lint yield increased by 14–28% in aeration treatments compared with the control. The higher lint yield was associated with more squares and bolls per plant which accompanied greater above ground biomass and an increase in root mass, root length and soil respiration. Air injection and HP effected greater water use, but also brought about an enhancement of water use efficiency (WUE) for pod and lint yield, and increased leaf photosynthetic rate in both species but had no effect on transpiration rate and stomatal conductance per unit leaf area. Aeration‐induced enhanced root function was arguably responsible for greater fruit set and yield in all three crops, while in vegetable soybean greater canopy cover, radiation interception and total vegetative biomass were responsible for additional yield benefit. Increased aeration of the root zone in heavy clay soils employing either air injection or HP proved beneficial to SDI irrigated crops, irrespective of the soil water conditions, and can add value to grower investments in SDI.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide increased zucchini fruit yield by 25%.

Treatment
HP treatmente0
Outcome
Fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield, number and shoot weight increased by 25%, 29% and 24% respectively due to HP treatment compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“zucchini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide increased zucchini fruit number by 29%.

Treatment
HP treatmente0
Outcome
numbere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield, number and shoot weight increased by 25%, 29% and 24% respectively due to HP treatment compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“zucchini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide increased zucchini shoot weight by 24%.

Treatment
HP treatmente0
Outcome
shoot weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield, number and shoot weight increased by 25%, 29% and 24% respectively due to HP treatment compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“zucchini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aeration increased vegetable soybean fresh pod yield by 82–96%.

Taxon
vegetable soybeane0
Treatment
aeration treatmentse0
Outcome
Fresh pod yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
82–96%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Fresh pod yield of vegetable soybean increased by 82–96% in aeration treatments compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1086 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher soybean pod yield was associated with more pods and greater pod weight.

Taxon
vegetable soybeant0
Organ / stage
pods per plante0
Outcome
yield increasee0
Direction
increasee0

Verbatim

e0

“The yield increase was associated with more pods per plant and greater mean pod weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“vegetable soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aeration increased soybean aboveground biomass and light interception.

Taxon
vegetable soybeant0
Treatment
aeratione0
Outcome
above ground biomass and light interceptione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher above ground biomass and light interception were evident with aeration, irrespective of soil water treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“vegetable soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aeration increased cotton lint yield by 14–28%.

Treatment
aeration treatmentse0
Outcome
cotton lint yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14–28%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton lint yield increased by 14–28% in aeration treatments compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1403 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton lint yield was associated with more squares and bolls.

Organ / stage
squares and bolls per plante0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher lint yield was associated with more squares and bolls per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–109 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher cotton lint yield accompanied greater biomass and root growth and soil respiration.

Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
above ground biomasse0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which accompanied greater above ground biomass and an increase in root mass, root length and soil respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1589 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air injection and HP increased crop water use.

Taxon
vegetable soybeant0
Treatment
Air injection and HPe0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Air injection and HP effected greater water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1638 · show in text ↑
t0

“vegetable soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aeration improved water use efficiency for pod yield.

Taxon
vegetable soybeant0
Treatment
Air injection and HPt1
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE) for pode0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“an enhancement of water use efficiency (WUE) for pod and lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1730 · show in text ↑
t0

“vegetable soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
t1

“Air injection and HP effected greater water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aeration improved water use efficiency for lint yield.

Treatment
Air injection and HPt1
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE) for pod and lint yielde0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an enhancement of water use efficiency (WUE) for pod and lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1730 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–109 · show in text ↑
t1

“Air injection and HP effected greater water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aeration increased leaf photosynthetic rate in soybean.

Taxon
vegetable soybeant0
Treatment
Air injection and HPt1
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased leaf photosynthetic rate in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1786 · show in text ↑
t0

“vegetable soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
t1

“Air injection and HP effected greater water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aeration increased leaf photosynthetic rate in cotton.

Treatment
Air injection and HPt1
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased leaf photosynthetic rate in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1786 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–109 · show in text ↑
t1

“Air injection and HP effected greater water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aeration did not affect leaf transpiration or stomatal conductance in soybean.

Taxon
vegetable soybeant0
Treatment
Air injection and HPt1
Outcome
transpiration rate and stomatal conductance per unit leaf areae0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“had no effect on transpiration rate and stomatal conductance per unit leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1791–1870 · show in text ↑
t0

“vegetable soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
t1

“Air injection and HP effected greater water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aeration did not affect leaf transpiration or stomatal conductance in cotton.

Treatment
Air injection and HPt1
Outcome
transpiration rate and stomatal conductance per unit leaf areae0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“had no effect on transpiration rate and stomatal conductance per unit leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1791–1870 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–109 · show in text ↑
t1

“Air injection and HP effected greater water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1638 · show in text ↑

hydrogen peroxide · physiology: gas exchange · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

hydrogen peroxide · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

hydrogen peroxide · growth · Cucurbita pepoResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

hydrogen peroxide · yield · Cucurbita pepoResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · physiology: gas exchange · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.