Paper · 2018 · Scientific Reports

Exogenously applied growth regulators protect the cotton crop from heat-induced injury by modulating plant defense mechanism

Muhammad Sarwar; Muhammad Farrukh Saleem; Najeeb Ullah; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
87
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Episodes of extremely high temperature during reproductive stages of cotton crops are common in many parts of the world. Heat stress negatively influences plant growth, physiology and ultimately lint yield. This study attempts to modulate heat-induced damage to cotton crops via application of growth regulators e.g. hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 30ppm), salicylic acid (SA 50ppm), moringa leaf extract (MLE 30 times diluted) and ascorbic acid (ASA 70ppm). Cotton plants were exposed to different thermal regimes by staggering sowing time (field) or exposing to elevated temperatures (38/24 °C and 45/30 °C) for one week during reproductive growth stages (glasshouse). Elevated temperatures significantly induced lipid membrane damage, which was evident from an increased malondialdehyde (MDA) level in cotton leaves. Heat-stressed plants also experienced a significant reduction in leaf chlorophyll contents, net photosynthetic rate and lint yield. Hydrogen peroxide outclassed all the other regulators in increasing leaf SOD, CAT activity, chlorophyll contents, net photosynthetic rate, number of sympodial branches, boll weight and fiber quality components. For example, hydrogen peroxide improved boll weight of heat stressed plants by 32% (supra), 12% (sub) under glasshouse and 18% (supra) under field conditions compared with water treated plants under the same temperatures. Growth regulators, specifically, H 2 O 2 protected physiological processes of cotton from heat-induced injury by capturing reactive oxygen species and modulating antioxidant enzymes. Thus, cotton performance in the future warmer climates may be improved through regulation (endogenous) or application (exogenous) hormones during reproductive phases.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated temperature increased cotton leaf malondialdehyde, indicating membrane damage.

Organ / stage
cotton leavese0
Treatment
Elevated temperaturese0
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) levele0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated temperatures significantly induced lipid membrane damage, which was evident from an increased malondialdehyde (MDA) level in cotton leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat stress significantly reduced cotton leaf chlorophyll, net photosynthetic rate and lint yield.

Treatment
Heat-stressede0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll contents, net photosynthetic rate and lint yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat-stressed plants also experienced a significant reduction in leaf chlorophyll contents, net photosynthetic rate and lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide outperformed the other regulators in raising cotton leaf SOD and CAT activity, chlorophyll and photosynthesis.

Treatment
Hydrogen peroxidee0
Outcome
leaf SOD, CAT activity, chlorophyll contents, net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
all the other regulatorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hydrogen peroxide outclassed all the other regulators in increasing leaf SOD, CAT activity, chlorophyll contents, net photosynthetic rate, number of sympodial branches, boll weight and fiber quality components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide outperformed the other regulators in raising sympodial branch number, boll weight and fiber quality components.

Treatment
Hydrogen peroxidee0
Outcome
number of sympodial branches, boll weight and fiber quality componentse0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
all the other regulatorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hydrogen peroxide outclassed all the other regulators in increasing leaf SOD, CAT activity, chlorophyll contents, net photosynthetic rate, number of sympodial branches, boll weight and fiber quality components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide improved boll weight by 32% under supraoptimal glasshouse heat compared with water treatment.

Treatment
hydrogen peroxidee0
Outcome
boll weighte0
Direction
improvede0
Value
32%e0
Qualifier
(supra)e0
Comparator
water treated plantse0
Setting
glasshousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hydrogen peroxide improved boll weight of heat stressed plants by 32% (supra), 12% (sub) under glasshouse and 18% (supra) under field conditions compared with water treated plants under the same temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1387 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide improved boll weight by 12% under suboptimal glasshouse heat compared with water treatment.

Treatment
hydrogen peroxidee0
Outcome
boll weighte0
Direction
improvede0
Value
12%e0
Qualifier
(sub)e0
Comparator
water treated plantse0
Setting
glasshousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hydrogen peroxide improved boll weight of heat stressed plants by 32% (supra), 12% (sub) under glasshouse and 18% (supra) under field conditions compared with water treated plants under the same temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1387 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide improved boll weight by 18% under supraoptimal field heat compared with water treatment.

Treatment
hydrogen peroxidee0
Outcome
boll weighte0
Direction
improvede0
Value
18%e0
Qualifier
(supra)e0
Comparator
water treated plantse0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hydrogen peroxide improved boll weight of heat stressed plants by 32% (supra), 12% (sub) under glasshouse and 18% (supra) under field conditions compared with water treated plants under the same temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1387 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute protection of cotton physiology by growth regulators, especially H2O2, to reactive oxygen capture and antioxidant enzyme modulation.

Treatment
H 2 O 2e0
Outcome
physiological processese0
Qualifier
capturing reactive oxygen species and modulating antioxidant enzymese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth regulators, specifically, H 2 O 2 protected physiological processes of cotton from heat-induced injury by capturing reactive oxygen species and modulating antioxidant enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1570 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest hormone regulation or application during reproduction may improve future cotton performance.

Outcome
cotton performancee0
Qualifier
future warmer climatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton performance in the future warmer climates may be improved through regulation (endogenous) or application (exogenous) hormones during reproductive phases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1737 · show in text ↑

hydrogen peroxide · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

hydrogen peroxide · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

hydrogen peroxide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

heat · physiology: oxidative · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

13 papers: 2 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

heat · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

15 papers: 2 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.