Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cotton lint yield following fallow or rye did not differ between tillage systems.

A claim from Winter Cover and Tillage Influences on Coastal Plain Cotton Production · 1996

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton lint yield following fallow or rye did not differ between tillage systems.

Treatment
tillage systemse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not differe0
Qualifier
following fallow and ryee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Within winter cover treatments following fallow and rye, tillage systems did not differ in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1716
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59

Title

Winter Cover and Tillage Influences on Coastal Plain Cotton Production

Philip J. Bauer; Warren J. Busscher jpa 1996. doi:10.2134/jpa1996.0050

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e033270f56644d812427233534878fc1fd9bec06cdd5e269313663e069252d1b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

159 papers: 113 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this claim · 113 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

150 papers more in this group

See all 159 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.