Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fiber at most fruiting positions was longer and stronger under CCMS than ICMS.

A claim from A Comparative Study of Integrated Crop Management System vs. Conventional Crop Management System for Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality With Respect to Fruiting Position Under Different Soil Fertility Levels · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber at most fruiting positions was longer and stronger under CCMS than ICMS.

Treatment
CCMSe0
Outcome
Fiber at majority fruiting positionse0
Direction
longer and strongere0
Comparator
ICMSe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fiber at majority fruiting positions under CCMS were longer and stronger than those under ICMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–822
t0

“Cotton Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–113

Title

A Comparative Study of Integrated Crop Management System vs. Conventional Crop Management System for Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality With Respect to Fruiting Position Under Different Soil Fertility Levels

Xinyue Zhang; Hongkun Yang; John L. Snider; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2018. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00958

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-1438a7727339456870de6e37aea909bf714a3ecbae4efea92069a7a638937f76 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

cultivation system · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.