Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCMS had fewer bolls on FB1-10 and FP1-2 on FB11-15.

Treatment
CCMSe0
Outcome
bolls on fruiting branches 1-10 (FB1-10) and at fruiting position 1-2 (FP1-2) on FB11-15e0
Direction
Reducede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced bolls on fruiting branches 1-10 (FB1-10) and at fruiting position 1-2 (FP1-2) on FB11-15 could not be fully compensated by increased bolls on FB16+ under CCMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–651
t0

“Cotton Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–113

Title

A Comparative Study of Integrated Crop Management System vs. Conventional Crop Management System for Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality With Respect to Fruiting Position Under Different Soil Fertility Levels

Xinyue Zhang; Hongkun Yang; John L. Snider; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2018. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00958

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-ff19252323763729df1af90547413b4f3d210053695d65b60e9a622bb0efe04b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

cultivation system · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.