Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Early cotton biomass did not differ significantly among these treatments through 50 days.

A claim from Productivity and nutrient use efficiency of maize, sorghum, and cotton in the West African Dry Savanna · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early cotton biomass did not differ significantly among these treatments through 50 days.

Treatment
integrated soil–crop management practice, and high mineral fertilizer usee0
Outcome
Above‐ground biomass accumulatione0
Direction
did not differe0
Qualifier
50e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Above‐ground biomass accumulation did not differ significantly among the control, integrated soil–crop management practice, and high mineral fertilizer use up to 30, 50, and 60 d after planting for maize, cotton, and sorghum, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1083

Title

Productivity and nutrient use efficiency of maize, sorghum, and cotton in the West African Dry Savanna

Kokou Adambounou Amouzou; Jesse B. Naab; John P.A. Lamers; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 2018. doi:10.1002/jpln.201700139

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-c3081efacee7ac6b114ed27ab78c7358fff9d71df41bfcc597e07cf824eac8e0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

cultivation system · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
See all 5 papers →

fertilization · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 177 positive, 25 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 176 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

193 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.