Intervention effectmodel-written summary

K produced a positive NDVI response of 15%.

A claim from Prediction of Maize Yields from In-Season GreenSeeker Normalized Difference Vegetation Index and Dry Biomass as Influenced by Different Nutrient Combinations · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K produced a positive NDVI response of 15%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Ke0
Outcome
NDVI responsese0
Direction
Positivee0
Value
15%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prediction of Maize Yields from In-Season GreenSeeker Normalized Difference Vegetation Index and Dry Biomass as Influenced by Different Nutrient Combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–157
e0

“Positive NDVI responses of 56%, 14%, 15%, and 15% were recorded with N, P, K, and combined Ca+Mg+Zn+B+S, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–827

Title

Prediction of Maize Yields from In-Season GreenSeeker Normalized Difference Vegetation Index and Dry Biomass as Influenced by Different Nutrient Combinations

Hillary M. O. Otieno; George N. Chemining’wa; Shamie Zingore Journal of Agricultural Science 2020. doi:10.5539/jas.v13n1p165

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-16003dd59e6a2db029d54525787092914388da738ea4555523a6e1574d8ff7bc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

potassium · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

114 papers: 99 positive, 15 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

105 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.