Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Silica dioxide caused 46.7% pest mortality initially.

A claim from EFEITO RESIDUAL DE INSETICIDAS NATURAIS NO CONTROLE DE SITOPHILUS ZEAMAIS MOTS. EM MILHO ARMAZENADO · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica dioxide caused 46.7% pest mortality initially.

Treatment
Silica dioxidee0
Interactor
Sitophilus zeamaisSitophilus zeamaise2pest
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
causede0
Value
46.7e0
Qualifier
initiale0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitophilus zeamais
Sitophilus zeamais · InteractorThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID k3980-17 (next) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silica dioxide caused 46.7, 38.3 and 37.5% of mortality, respectively, in the initial (soon after the treatment with the powders or oils) and at 60 and 120 days of storage periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–995
e1

“stored corn grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–145
e2

“Sitophilus zeamais”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–89

Title

EFEITO RESIDUAL DE INSETICIDAS NATURAIS NO CONTROLE DE SITOPHILUS ZEAMAIS MOTS. EM MILHO ARMAZENADO

Rodrigo Leandro Braga de Castro Coitinho; José Vargas de Oliveira; Manoel Guedes Corrêa Gondim Junior; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2006

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-1612f6a007d028c91492be61d5ca93220736733b29298ba78cd15346f07fd700 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

silicon dioxide · Sitophilus zeamais · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.