Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sole cowpea had lower seed yield than cowpea intercropped with tomato.

A claim from Observations on Insect Infestation and Damage in Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata) Intercropped With Tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentum) in a Rain Forest Area of Nigeria · 1991

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole cowpea had lower seed yield than cowpea intercropped with tomato.

Treatment
cowpea intercropped with tomatoe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Sole cowpeae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sole cowpea had a significantly lower seed yield than cowpea intercropped with tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–740

Title

Observations on Insect Infestation and Damage in Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata) Intercropped With Tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentum) in a Rain Forest Area of Nigeria

T. I. Ofuya Experimental Agriculture 1991. doi:10.1017/s0014479700019384

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-16b9f5b3752e8e00340255ac5f8573746645eca3052fd6b0a120a9ce62728d8c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

Solanum lycopersicum · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

103 papers: 63 positive, 40 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

94 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.