Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spinosad produced 85% potato tuber moth mortality.

A claim from Determination of the efficacy of novel pesticides against potato tuber moth (Phthorimaea operculella zeller) in laboratory conditions on seed potato · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad produced 85% potato tuber moth mortality.

Treatment
Spinosade0
Interactor
potato tuber motht1pest
Outcome
mortality ratee0
Direction
highere1
Value
85%e0
Comparator
Bojhoe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mortality rate was Chlorantraniliprole (100%), Spinosad (85%), Bacillus thuringiensis (70%) whereas, the lowest mortality rate in treatment Bojho (60%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1477
e1

“three pesticides Chlorantraniliprole, Spinosad, and, Bacillus thuringiensis have higher efficacy than Bojho”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1317
t0

“seed potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–148
t1

“potato tuber moth (Phthorimaea operculella zeller)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–108

Title

Determination of the efficacy of novel pesticides against potato tuber moth (Phthorimaea operculella zeller) in laboratory conditions on seed potato

Aryal A; Mainali RP; Simkhada R; et al. Acta Entomology and Zoology 2024. doi:10.33545/27080013.2024.v5.i2b.162

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-188eba18607deddc8ee65563548fd09065eacb252e8f90d2e66ec4876c4fdb03 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

spinosad · pest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.