Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soaking fresh-cut cabbage in citric acid increased overall acceptance and organoleptic quality.

A claim from Effect of Storage Conditions on the Sensory Quality, Colour and Texture of Fresh-Cut Minimally Processed Cabbage with the Addition of Ascorbic Acid, Citric Acid and Calcium Chloride · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking fresh-cut cabbage in citric acid increased overall acceptance and organoleptic quality.

Treatment
Soaking with citric acide5
Outcome
overall acceptance and organoleptic qualitye6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fresh-Cut Minimally Processed Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–112
e5

“Soaking with citric acid helped retain the color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–669
e6

“increased the overall acceptance and organoleptic quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–731

Title

Effect of Storage Conditions on the Sensory Quality, Colour and Texture of Fresh-Cut Minimally Processed Cabbage with the Addition of Ascorbic Acid, Citric Acid and Calcium Chloride

Eleni Manolopoulou; Theodoros Varzakas Food and Nutrition Sciences 2011. doi:10.4236/fns.2011.29130

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-18cb5ae9c76a67e4a9d300eb6115c7d8adab53f63dc37c64d043ad072a16dc76 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

application · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.