Claim · model-written summary
Reduced tillage did not affect chickpea yield.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Reduced tillagee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea”
e0“Reduced tillage did not affect yield, but positively affected SOC.”
Title
Ruhollah Naderi; Ehsan Bijanzadeh; Todd P. Egan Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2021. doi:10.1080/00103624.2021.1872599
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect CCM+N had the highest chickpea yield, without a significant difference from N alone.
- Intervention effect CCM+N had the highest chickpea 1000-seed weight, without a significant difference from N alone.
- Intervention effect CCM+N had the highest chickpea fruit length, without a significant difference from N alone.
- Intervention effect CCM+N had the highest chickpea plant height, without a significant difference from N alone.
- Intervention effect CCM increased chickpea yield by 28% relative to CONT.
- Intervention effect CCM+N increased chickpea yield by 46% relative to CONT.
- Intervention effect N increased chickpea yield by 40% relative to CONT.
- Intervention effect CCM or CCM+N plots had greater soil organic carbon than N or control plots.
- Intervention effect Reduced tillage produced significantly higher soil organic carbon than conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect CCM+N gave the highest total soil nitrogen, followed by N then CCM.
- Intervention effect CCM+N gave the highest seed N content, followed by N then CCM.
- Recommendation Combined manure and nitrogen fertilizer was recommended as providing acceptable yields while reducing environmental impact.