Claim · model-written summary
Pod numbers and yields were greater under R/B = 3:7 light than under the other LED lights.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- R/B = 3:7 lighte0
- Outcome
- pod numbers and yieldse0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- the other LED lightse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“The pod numbers and yields were greater in plants under R/B = 3:7 light than in plants under the other LED lights”
Title
Effects of Light‐Emitting Diodes on the Growth of Peanut Plants
Cheng Li; Dan Liu; Lili Li; et al. Agronomy Journal 2018. doi:10.2134/agronj2017.11.0674
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect At the seedling stage, fresh weight, dry weight and height were greatest in peanut plants under R/B = 7:3 light.
- Intervention effect At the seedling stage, root length and chlorophyll content were greatest in peanut plants under R/B = 7:3 light.
- Intervention effect At the blooming stage, starch concentration and soluble sugars were greatest under R light, followed by R/B = 1:1 light.
- Intervention effect At the blooming stage, sucrose concentration was greatest under R/B = 7:3 light, followed by R/B = 1:1 light.
- Intervention effect At the blooming stage, chlorophyll concentration was greatest under R/B = 1:1 light.
- Recommendation R/B = 1:1 light was conducive to peanut growth at the blooming stage.
- Intervention effect At the pod-setting stage, sucrose concentration and soluble sugars were greatest under R/B = 1:1 light.
- Intervention effect At the pod-setting stage, starch content was greatest under R/B = 3:7 light.
- Recommendation R/B = 3:7 light was best for pod growth and yield and could serve as an alternative light source for peanut industry cultivation.