Paper · 1999 · Crop Science

Continuous Daily Light Period and Temperature Influence Peanut Yield in Nutrient Film Technique

T. Rowell; D. G. Mortley; P. A. Loretan; et al.

8
claims
24
verbatim quotes
26
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) is under investigation for use in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Advanced Life Support (ALS) program as a food source for extended space missions. The objective of this study was an evaluation of the effect of a continuous light period combined with constant or diurnally cyded temperatures on pod and seed yield, plant biomass, harvest index, and gas exchange in ‘Georgia Red’ peanut grown hydroponically under the nutrient film technique. Experiments were conducted in controlled‐environment growth chambers. Treatments were light/ dark periods of 12/12 h or 24/0 h in combination with a constant 28 or 28/22°C. Relative humidity was 70 ± 5% and a photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) at canopy level of 250 or 500 μmol m −2 s −1 for 2410 h and 12/12‐h light periods, respectively. Plants exposed to 24/0 h light produced more foliage biomass, lower pod and mature seed yields, and lower harvest indices. Temperature had no significant effect on foliage biomass yield. However, plants exposed to diurnal 28/22°C produced higher pod and immature seed yield and a higher harvest index. The mean number of flowers reaching anthesis was higher among plants grown at a 12/12‐h light period, regardless of temperature. Leaf net photosynthetic rates and stomatal conductance were higher among plants grown at 12/12‐h light period, regardless of temperature. The results suggest that, while light period influenced, foliage, pod, and seed yield, temperature influenced foliage dry mass, immature seed yield, and harvest index.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut plants exposed to 24/0 h light produced more foliage biomass than under 12/12 h light.

Treatment
24/0 h lighte2
Outcome
foliage biomasse2
Direction
moree2
Comparator
12/12 he1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) is under investigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatments were light/ dark periods of 12/12 h or 24/0 h in combination with a constant 28 or 28/22°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–667 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants exposed to 24/0 h light produced more foliage biomass, lower pod and mature seed yields, and lower harvest indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut plants exposed to 24/0 h light had lower pod and mature seed yields than under 12/12 h light.

Treatment
24/0 h lighte2
Outcome
pod and mature seed yieldse2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
12/12 he1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) is under investigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatments were light/ dark periods of 12/12 h or 24/0 h in combination with a constant 28 or 28/22°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–667 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants exposed to 24/0 h light produced more foliage biomass, lower pod and mature seed yields, and lower harvest indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut plants exposed to 24/0 h light had lower harvest indices than under 12/12 h light.

Treatment
24/0 h lighte2
Outcome
harvest indicese2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
12/12 he1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) is under investigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatments were light/ dark periods of 12/12 h or 24/0 h in combination with a constant 28 or 28/22°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–667 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants exposed to 24/0 h light produced more foliage biomass, lower pod and mature seed yields, and lower harvest indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature had no significant effect on peanut foliage biomass yield.

Treatment
Temperaturee3
Outcome
foliage biomass yielde3
Direction
no significant effecte3
Comparator
constant 28e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) is under investigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatments were light/ dark periods of 12/12 h or 24/0 h in combination with a constant 28 or 28/22°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–667 · show in text ↑
e3

“Temperature had no significant effect on foliage biomass yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diurnal 28/22°C produced higher pod and immature seed yield than constant 28°C.

Treatment
diurnal 28/22°Ce4
Outcome
pod and immature seed yielde4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
constant 28e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) is under investigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatments were light/ dark periods of 12/12 h or 24/0 h in combination with a constant 28 or 28/22°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–667 · show in text ↑
e4

“plants exposed to diurnal 28/22°C produced higher pod and immature seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diurnal 28/22°C produced a higher harvest index than constant 28°C.

Treatment
diurnal 28/22°Ce5
Outcome
harvest indexe5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
constant 28e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) is under investigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatments were light/ dark periods of 12/12 h or 24/0 h in combination with a constant 28 or 28/22°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–667 · show in text ↑
e5

“plants exposed to diurnal 28/22°C produced higher pod and immature seed yield and a higher harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut plants grown at a 12/12 h light period had a higher mean number of flowers reaching anthesis than at 24/0 h, regardless of temperature.

Treatment
12/12e6
Outcome
mean number of flowers reaching anthesise6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
24/0 he1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) is under investigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatments were light/ dark periods of 12/12 h or 24/0 h in combination with a constant 28 or 28/22°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–667 · show in text ↑
e6

“The mean number of flowers reaching anthesis was higher among plants grown at a 12/12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut plants grown at a 12/12 h light period had higher leaf net photosynthetic rates and stomatal conductance than at 24/0 h.

Treatment
12/12e7
Outcome
Leaf net photosynthetic rates and stomatal conductancee7
Direction
highere7
Comparator
24/0 he1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) is under investigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatments were light/ dark periods of 12/12 h or 24/0 h in combination with a constant 28 or 28/22°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–667 · show in text ↑
e7

“Leaf net photosynthetic rates and stomatal conductance were higher among plants grown at 12/12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1360 · show in text ↑

light · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 8 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.