Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zn at 5 kg/ha did not differ statistically from 6 kg Zn/ha for yield attributes and yield of blackgram.

A claim from Amelioration of zinc deficiency in blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) through soil applied zinc in Typic Haplustepts soil of Rajasthan · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn at 5 kg/ha did not differ statistically from 6 kg Zn/ha for yield attributes and yield of blackgram.

Taxon
blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)Vigna mungoe0
Treatment
application of Zn@5 kg ha-1e3
Outcome
yield attributes, yielde3
Direction
at pare3
Comparator
application of 6 kg Zn ha-1e3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To study the amelioration of zinc deficiency in blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) through soil applied zinc in Typic Haplustepts soil of Rajasthan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–144
e3

“the effect of application of Zn@5 kg ha-1 on yield attributes, yield, nutrient content, uptake, quality and economics of blackgram was found statistically at par with the application of 6 kg Zn ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1195

Title

Amelioration of zinc deficiency in blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) through soil applied zinc in Typic Haplustepts soil of Rajasthan

G. Jat; S.K. Sharma; R.H. Meena; et al. Journal of Environmental Biology 2021. doi:10.22438/jeb/42/6/mrn-1523

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-1a6165e2bbf7b0f4f9a7449477420a3dcad23a21a7a902be1b7575725995cb40 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results differ

35 papers: 33 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 32 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.