Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Aboveground biomass did not differ significantly between DW and NW treatments.

A claim from Asymmetric warming effects on N dynamics and productivity in rice (Oryza sativaL.) · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground biomass did not differ significantly between DW and NW treatments.

Treatment
DWe1
Outcome
aboveground biomasse1
Direction
insignificant differencee1
Comparator
NWe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65
e1

“This effect may be one of the primary reasons for the insignificant difference in the aboveground biomass between the DW and NW treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1870

Title

Asymmetric warming effects on N dynamics and productivity in rice (Oryza sativaL.)

Xiaojin Xie; Yaohong Zhang; Renying Li; et al. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition 2014. doi:10.1080/00380768.2014.907531

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-1a762aaa88f4d8cdd25b2f69ef0daf4b6abbc048ff1d1bfbbcf52c6960753724 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer