Claim · model-written summary
In the first determination, qualified clones had 77.7% survival, versus 61.3% for loblolly pine.
- Taxon
- Pinus massoniana
Pinus massonianae1 - Material
- qualified clonese0
- Interactor
- Bursaphelenchus xylophilus
Bursaphelenchus xylophiluse2pathogen - Outcome
- survival ratee0
- Direction
- overe0
- Value
- 77.7%e0
- Qualifier
- 61.3%e0
- Comparator
- loblolly pinee0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the survival rate of qualified clones over loblolly pine was respectively 77.7% and 66.2%,the average was 81.4% and 94.5%,and the control loblolly pine was 61.3% and 82.1% respectively”
e1“Pinus massoniana clones”
e2“inoculating Bursaphelenchus xylophilus”
Title
Hao Yan-ping China Forestry Science and Technology 2012
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Candidate Pinus clones had higher survival than loblolly pine after inoculation.
- Observation In the second determination, qualified clones had 66.2% survival, versus 82.1% for loblolly pine.
- Observation The average survival was 81.4% in the first determination.
- Observation The average survival was 94.5% in the second determination.
- Observation The authors report that disease resistance of the clones improved.