Abstract
In order to get the Pinus massoniana clones with strong resistance to pine wilt disease,this study conducted the resistance determination for two times by inoculating Bursaphelenchus xylophilus into the clones,which were cultivated by using Pinus massoniana seedlings as scion and Pinus ellittii as rootstock.And the results showed that the survival rate of these clones was higher than loblolly pine.Through the first and second resistance determination,the survival rate of qualified clones over loblolly pine was respectively 77.7% and 66.2%,the average was 81.4% and 94.5%,and the control loblolly pine was 61.3% and 82.1% respectively,and the disease resistance of these clones was improved obviously.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Candidate Pinus clones had higher survival than loblolly pine after inoculation.
- Taxon
- Pinus massoniana
Pinus massonianae2 - Material
- clonese2
- Treatment
- inoculating Bursaphelenchus xylophiluse1
- Interactor
- Bursaphelenchus xylophilus
Bursaphelenchus xylophiluse1pathogen - Outcome
- survival ratee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- loblolly pinee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the results showed that the survival rate of these clones was higher than loblolly pine.”
e1“inoculating Bursaphelenchus xylophilus into the clones”
e2“Pinus massoniana clones”
Claim · model-written summary
In the first determination, qualified clones had 77.7% survival, versus 61.3% for loblolly pine.
- Taxon
- Pinus massonianaPinus massonianae1
- Material
- qualified clonese0
- Interactor
- Bursaphelenchus xylophilusBursaphelenchus xylophiluse2pathogen
- Outcome
- survival ratee0
- Direction
- overe0
- Value
- 77.7%e0
- Qualifier
- 61.3%e0
- Comparator
- loblolly pinee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the survival rate of qualified clones over loblolly pine was respectively 77.7% and 66.2%,the average was 81.4% and 94.5%,and the control loblolly pine was 61.3% and 82.1% respectively”
e1“Pinus massoniana clones”
e2“inoculating Bursaphelenchus xylophilus”
Claim · model-written summary
In the second determination, qualified clones had 66.2% survival, versus 82.1% for loblolly pine.
- Taxon
- Pinus massonianaPinus massonianae1
- Material
- qualified clonese0
- Interactor
- Bursaphelenchus xylophilusBursaphelenchus xylophiluse2pathogen
- Outcome
- survival ratee0
- Value
- 66.2%e0
- Qualifier
- 82.1%e0
- Comparator
- loblolly pinee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the survival rate of qualified clones over loblolly pine was respectively 77.7% and 66.2%,the average was 81.4% and 94.5%,and the control loblolly pine was 61.3% and 82.1% respectively”
e1“Pinus massoniana clones”
e2“inoculating Bursaphelenchus xylophilus”
Claim · model-written summary
The average survival was 81.4% in the first determination.
- Taxon
- Pinus massonianaPinus massonianae1
- Interactor
- Bursaphelenchus xylophilusBursaphelenchus xylophiluse2pathogen
- Outcome
- averagee0
- Value
- 81.4%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the average was 81.4% and 94.5%”
e1“Pinus massoniana clones”
e2“inoculating Bursaphelenchus xylophilus”
Claim · model-written summary
The average survival was 94.5% in the second determination.
- Taxon
- Pinus massonianaPinus massonianae1
- Interactor
- Bursaphelenchus xylophilusBursaphelenchus xylophiluse2pathogen
- Outcome
- averagee0
- Value
- 94.5%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the average was 81.4% and 94.5%”
e1“Pinus massoniana clones”
e2“inoculating Bursaphelenchus xylophilus”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors report that disease resistance of the clones improved.
- Taxon
- Pinus massonianaPinus massonianae1
- Interactor
- Bursaphelenchus xylophilusBursaphelenchus xylophiluse2pathogen
- Outcome
- disease resistancee0
- Direction
- improvede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the disease resistance of these clones was improved obviously”
e1“Pinus massoniana clones”
e2“inoculating Bursaphelenchus xylophilus”
The same questions in other papers
Bursaphelenchus · survival · Pinus massoniana (Chinese red pine)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
inoculation · survival · Pinus massoniana (Chinese red pine)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.