Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increasing rapeseed seeding rate did not influence rapeseed aboveground biomass, seed yield or harvest index.

A claim from Flixweed (Descurainia sophia) Shade Tolerance and Possibilities for Flixweed Management Using Rapeseed Seeding Rate · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing rapeseed seeding rate did not influence rapeseed aboveground biomass, seed yield or harvest index.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
Increasing crop seeding ratee1
Outcome
aboveground biomass, seed yield, and harvest indexe1
Direction
did not influencee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–102
e1

“Increasing crop seeding rate did not influence rapeseed aboveground biomass, seed yield, and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–832

Title

Flixweed (Descurainia sophia) Shade Tolerance and Possibilities for Flixweed Management Using Rapeseed Seeding Rate

Christopher A. Landau; Brian J. Schutte; Abdel O. Mesbah; et al. Weed Technology 2017. doi:10.1017/wet.2017.33

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-1b256c866bbb5d9fb7a3668975a68eba209a62f3e58e287387c39920159c699d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 54 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.