Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increasing rapeseed seeding rate negatively affected rapeseed seed oil content in one of two site-years.

A claim from Flixweed (Descurainia sophia) Shade Tolerance and Possibilities for Flixweed Management Using Rapeseed Seeding Rate · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing rapeseed seeding rate negatively affected rapeseed seed oil content in one of two site-years.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
Increasing crop seeding ratee1
Outcome
seed oil contente1
Direction
negatively affectede1
Qualifier
one of two site-yearse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Verbatim

t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–102
e1

“Increasing crop seeding rate did not influence rapeseed aboveground biomass, seed yield, and harvest index, but negatively affected rapeseed seed oil content in one of two site-years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–908

Title

Flixweed (Descurainia sophia) Shade Tolerance and Possibilities for Flixweed Management Using Rapeseed Seeding Rate

Christopher A. Landau; Brian J. Schutte; Abdel O. Mesbah; et al. Weed Technology 2017. doi:10.1017/wet.2017.33

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-5e5d3705071fb0d30dea2404c7ca0348455c77e3736631681414ed81081573fe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

density · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 7 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.