Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Preemergence butachlor at 1.50 kg/ha outperformed posthalod herbicides for weed and rice nutrient uptake.

A claim from Influence of Integrated Weed Management Practices on Weed Competition for Nutrients in Puddle-sown Rice · 1999

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence butachlor at 1.50 kg/ha outperformed posthalod herbicides for weed and rice nutrient uptake.

Treatment
butachlor 1.50 kg/hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
uptake of N, P and K by weeds and ricee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
post-halod herbicide treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preemergence application of pretilachlor 0.80 kg/ha and butachlor 1.50 kg/ha at seven days after sowing (DAS) remaining statistically at par with post-halod hand weeding was significantly better than all post-halod herbicide treatments (pretilachlor 0.80 kg/ha, butachlor 1.50 kg/ha and 2, 4–0 (ethyl ester) 0.50 kg/ha alone and in combination with pretilachlor 0.40 kg/ha and butachlor 0.75 kg/ha), with regard to uptake of N, P and K by weeds and rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–881

Title

Influence of Integrated Weed Management Practices on Weed Competition for Nutrients in Puddle-sown Rice

S.S. Rana; N. N. Angiras Indian Journal of Weed Science 1999

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-1b8ae620c3d2be8229a2ff60988c32cc1bfef2df35ba9e35c9fadb74bb92ede9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

butachlor · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

97 papers: 90 positive, 7 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

88 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.