Claim · model-written summary
Shading did not affect taproot sucrose content on a dry weight basis.
- Taxon
- sugarbeet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Shadinge0
- Outcome
- sucrose content of the taproote0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Shading reduced total dry matter production by 29%, but had no effect on either the root:shoot ratio or the sucrose content of the taproot on a dry weight basis.”
t0“Sugarbeet”
Title
Partitioning within the Taproot Sink of Sugarbeet: Effect of Photosynthate Supply1
Roger Wyse Crop Science 1980. doi:10.2135/cropsci1980.0011183x002000020027x
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Shading reduced total dry matter production by 29 percent.
- Intervention effect Shading did not affect root to shoot ratio.
- Intervention effect Supply treatments altered root size, with compensating changes in vascular ring frequency.
- Intervention effect Supply treatments left vascular density unchanged.
- Intervention effect Supply treatments left cell size unchanged.
- Mechanism The authors infer a constant ratio of sucrose to nonsucrose dry matter across photosynthate supply.