Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Inoculated wheat had higher shoot EGT content of 0.1168 ± 0.071 μM on day 10.

A claim from Streptomyces coelicolor-plant association facilitates ergothioneine uptake in Triticum aestivum · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated wheat had higher shoot EGT content of 0.1168 ± 0.071 μM on day 10.

Organ / stage
shoote0
Treatment
inoculated with S. coelicolore0
Interactor
S. coelicolorStreptomyces coelicolore0symbiont
Outcome
shoot EGT contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.1168 ± 0.071 μMe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Streptomyces coelicolor
Streptomyces coelicolor · InteractorLörzing, Pilar (ORCID: 0009-0009-2532-9121); Iliasov, Denis (ORCID: 0009-0004-6533-7410); Schlierf, Michael (ORCID: 0000-0002-6209-2364); Mascher, Thorsten (ORC · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat plants inoculated with S. coelicolor and extracted for EGT on day 10 post incubation, showed higher shoot EGT content (0.1168 ± 0.071 μM) in bacteria treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1300

Title

Streptomyces coelicolor-plant association facilitates ergothioneine uptake in Triticum aestivum

Alexandra Pipinos; Jinjun Kan; Andrew Smith; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2025. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1637050

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-1bbbdcb75af697ee0e3157c8b5fb069249ac68397d097e816ca1e7a1d5431d24 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 95 positive, 10 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Azospirillum inoculation did not significantly change wheat Mg2+ content.

    Nitrate Reductase in Wheat Plants Grown Under Water Stress and Inoculated with Azospirillum spp. · 2003

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Leaf apoplast antifungal proteolytic activity decreased in wheat plants inoculated only with S. tritici.

    Trichoderma spp. as elicitors of wheat plant defense responses against Septoria tritici · 2007

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Mycorrhizal inoculation left cation concentrations little altered in field spring wheat shoots.

    INCREASED UPTAKE OF BROMIDE AND CHLORIDE BY PLANTS INFECTED WITH VESICULAR‐ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAS · 1983

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Fusarium inoculation disrupted proton-gradient balance across membranes in the fhb1- NIL.

    A Quantitative Proteomics View on the Function of Qfhb1, a Major QTL for Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in Wheat · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Fungal inoculations did not affect leaf carbon isotope discrimination.

    Phosphorus Fertilization and Fungal Inoculations Affected the Physiology, Phosphorus Uptake and Growth of Spring Wheat Under Rainfed Conditions on the Canadian Prairies · 2012

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Composting with microbes and organics did not alter rock phosphate phosphorus availability.

    DIFFERENTIAL CAPACITY OF WHEAT CULTIVARS AND WHITE LUPIN TO ACQUIRE PHOSPHORUS FROM ROCK PHOSPHATE, PHYTATE AND SOLUBLE PHOSPHORUS SOURCES · 2012

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Inoculation with the pathogen significantly reduced wheat leaf lipids, including MGDG and DGDG.

    Lipid Profiles in Wheat Cultivars Resistant and Susceptible to Tan Spot and the Effect of Disease on the Profiles · 2012

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Inoculated wheat grain had lower β-D-glucan content than uninfected grain.

    β-D-glucan content of wheat kernels after inoculation With Fusarium culmorum Sacc · 2012 · compared with grains without infection

    Opposite direction

96 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.