Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Red and white shade nets gave better plant height, leaf number and biomass of cordyline than the control.

A claim from Effect of different coloured shade nets on production and quality of cordyline · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red and white shade nets gave better plant height, leaf number and biomass of cordyline than the control.

Taxon
Cordyline terminalisCordyline fruticosae0
Treatment
red and white shade netse1
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves, biomasse1
Direction
better performancee1
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cordyline fruticosa
Cordyline fruticosa · TaxonCliff · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cordyline terminalis is an important ornamental plant used for its beautiful foliage as cut green”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97
e1

“The cut greens grown under red and white shade nets were exposed to higher PAR and transmittance than other colour nets and hence had better performance in terms of plant height, number of leaves, biomass, leaf area, photosynthetic rate, harvest index compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–866

Title

Effect of different coloured shade nets on production and quality of cordyline

ABHAY KUMAR GAURAV; D V S RAJU; T JANAKIRAM; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2016. doi:10.56093/ijas.v86i7.59736

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-1c8e8648eb3d099e99a5aab9468568eb1a25c8044a431a3d1a020951386ada62 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

shade · growth · Cordyline fruticosa (ti plant)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.