Claim · model-written summary
Upper node tillers had greater compensation than middle and lower nodes.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Organ / stage
- upper node groupe0
- Outcome
- tillering compensational capacitye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- middle and low node groupe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“tillering compensational capacity of upper node group was higher than that of middle and low node group under enough water and fertilizer”
t0“rice”
Title
The compensation capacity of tillering and production of main stem nodes in rice
Wei Min 2013
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Intervention effect Later tiller removal reduced leaf area index.
- Intervention effect Later tiller removal improved stem-base light and delayed shade escape.
- Intervention effect Later tiller removal promoted upper node tiller differentiation and growth.
- Association Upper node tiller development reduced effective panicles and leaf area index.
- Observation Canopy light distribution, chlorophyll and protein content increased.
- Observation Leaf senescence was delayed and protective enzyme activity declined slowly.
- Observation Light penetration loss increased and interception decreased.
- Observation Light interception rate decreased.
- Observation Leaf net assimilation rate increased.
- Observation Economic coefficient tended to increase.
- Observation Crop growth rate decreased.
- Observation Dry matter accumulation significantly decreased.
- Intervention effect Economic yield did not significantly differ between early and middle tiller emergence treatments.
- Intervention effect Economic yield differed extremely significantly between early and later tiller emergence treatments.